3.2
Recommend to a friend
67%
Say this is a great place to work
67%
Proud to have on resume
70%
Employee - Director
Great company with lots of opportunities. The negative is that managers move to other post within 16 to 20 months. Makes it hard to achieve a lot of development. System are old and many division still work with prehistoric software
Employee - Manager / Senior Manager
Easy going. Good staff.
Employee - Manager / Senior Manager
Good, relaxed work culture.
Employee - Manager / Senior Manager
Well respected. Known company.
Employee - Director
I enjoyed a 30 year career with TE thriving in multiple roles including Machine Drafter, Product Designer, IT Supervisor, IT Manager & IT Director. My assignments took me to most the of the European countries as well as Japan, China, Brazil and India.
Employee - Director
Diversity, challenges, global exposure, salary.
Employee - Engineer
I left 5 years ago. A lot could have changed. Morale was low and the company was laying off its long time knowledge workers in favor of young people right out of school. No job security and managers were brought in who knew Nothing about the business. Too much change way too fast.
Employee - Manager / Senior Manager
Unstable and frequent layoffs
Employee - Manager / Senior Manager
As long as you are associated with influential people that are liked by senior management you are ok. If you are not in the right click, you are laid off eventually. The company is crazy as they hire Ivy League grads with no realistic business experience to develop forecasts, then the company commits to the forecast. When the market turns against them, instead of tweaking the forecast, they simply fire people to meet or get close to a quarterly number. The result is a lot of churn. You are either working for TE for at least 10 years or you are brand new to the organization. There is little in between
Employee - Manager / Senior Manager
TE is its own worst enemy. The market knows they have terrible service and lead times for new products are too long and TE requires a stocking package minimum purchase that puts much of the risk on distributors. This makes the numbers they report artificially good as they don't take returns of stock. If TE could reduce the bureaucracy and multiple communications required to the BU's before doing anything, they would do much better in market. Everyone knows this but TE won't do anything about it. Only a matter of time before they can only compete in a narrow product focus due to pricing strategy. New engineers will design in other manufacturers products that have better service and pricing along with less ego